¿Qué acciones están comprando y vendiendo los senadores de EEUU?

Comparto un recurso con el que podemos acceder a los movimientos de cartera de los senadores de EEUU:

 http://quiverquant.com/sources/senatetrading 

También se puede filtrar por empresa para ver quién está comprando o vendiendo qué acción, por ejemplo Amazon:

Algunas preguntas que me surgen:
¿Son fiables estos datos?
¿Pueden ayudarnos de algún modo a tomar mejores decisiones en nuestra cartera de inversión?

¿Qué os parece la herramienta?

La herramienta cuanto menos es interesante. Pero ¿Cómo sabemos que la fuente es fiable?

Pienso que sería de ayuda si estos senadores tienen información privilegiada, pero pienso que todo este tema está muy desarrollado en Estados Unidos pese a lo que la mayoría de la gente pueda creer. Así que dudo que un senador compre acciones de una empresa por una información exclusiva que posea y con ello saque lucro personal. Aunque nunca se sabe.

Por otra parte, me parece mucho más fiable y representativo del negocio ver que insiders están comprando las acciones de su compañía, aunque también te puedan engañar.

Eso sí, en cuanto tenga un rato le echo un ojo a la web! 

A mi me parece muy interesante como curiosidad. A nivel practico no estoy  muy seguro ni de la fiabilidad de la web ni de la fiabilidad de las acciones que realizan...

WASHINGTON — Senator Richard M. Burr, Republican of North Carolina, temporarily stepped down as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, a day after F.B.I. agents seized his cellphone as part of an investigation into whether he sold hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of stocks using nonpublic information about the coronavirus.

The seizure and an accompanying search for his electronic storage accounts, which were confirmed by an investigator briefed on the case, represented a significant escalation of the inquiry by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Burr decided to step aside “during the pendency of the investigation” on Thursday and informed Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader.

“We agreed that this decision would be in the best interests of the committee and will be effective at the end of the day tomorrow,” Mr. McConnell said.

Mr. Burr sold the stock in mid-February before the market cratered and while President Trump and some supporters were downplaying the threat of the virus. At the same time, Mr. Burr was receiving briefings and involved in conversations suggesting the country faced a burgeoning health crisis that could hurt the economy.

White Collar Watch: Pandemic insider trading investigations
Peter J. Henning is a professor at the Wayne State University law school, and previously served in the enforcement division of the S.E.C. and the fraud section of the U.S. Department of Justice. Here, he considers the prospects for charges against senators over coronavirus-related trades.
The Justice Department is looking into stock trades by several lawmakers after they received closed-door briefings and other information during the early stages of the outbreak. The 2012 STOCK Act prohibits lawmakers from trading on material nonpublic information received as part of their duties.
Senator Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina, recently had his phone seized by the F.B.I., and has temporarily stepped down as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. He denies wrongdoing. Other senators — Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California; James Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma; and Kelly Loeffler, Republican of Georgia — have also come under scrutiny. All deny wrongdoing. Unlike Mr. Burr, they also said that they did not direct the trades in question.
Will indictments follow? Insider trading is notoriously hard to prosecute, and the STOCK Act is yet to feature prominently in any case. But a verdict in a case last year, which involved a former staffer at a Medicare agency tipping off hedge funds, established that tippers could be prosecuted even if there wasn’t a quid pro quo. This is a boon for prosecutors.
Could the Securities and Exchange Commission also get involved? Lawmakers are protected by the “speech or debate clause” of the Constitution, which limits liability for actions taken as part of the legislative process. Trading stocks would not necessarily qualify, so that shouldn’t hold back the S.E.C. In March, the agency said it was on heightened alert for insider trading around coronavirus information.
Still, I suspect that the Justice Department will take the lead here. This is a high-profile investigation, to say the least, and the S.E.C. could file a parallel civil enforcement action